Biomarkers

Introduction – Why do we need ‘biomarkers? Biomarkers of protein oxidation Introduction Major issues/questions Protein carbonyl biomarkers Biochemistry Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations in use Protein thiol biomarkers Biochemistry Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Aliphatic amino acid biomarkers Biochemistry Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Oxidised Tryptophan Biomarkers Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Oxidised tyrosine biomarkers Biochemistry Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Formation of neoepitopes on oxidised proteins Validation of assays for protein oxidation biomarkers Relationship of protein oxidation to disease Modulation of protein oxidation biomarkers by antioxidants Future perspectives Introduction to lipid peroxidation biomarkers Introduction: biochemistry of lipid peroxidation Malondialdehyde Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Conjugated dienes Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations of use LDL lag phase Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations of use Hydrocarbon gases Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Lipofuscin Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitation on use Lipid peroxides Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Isoprostanes Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Possible new biomarkers of lipid oxidation Relationship of lipid peroxidation to disease Modulation of lipid peroxidation biomarkers by antioxidants Functional consequences of lipid peroxidation Contribution of dietary intake to lipid peroxidation products Biomarkers of DNA oxidation Introduction Confounding factors Units and terminology Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage Lymphocytes as surrogate tissues Measurement of DNA damage with the comet assay Practical details Storage, stability, and limitations of the assay Measurement of DNA base oxidation by HPLC Practical details Storage, stability and limitations of the method Measurement of DNA base oxidation by GC–MS Biochemistry of 8-oxoguanine, adenine and fapy derivatives Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations of the method Analysis of guanine oxidation products in urine Method of measurement Limitations and criticisms Immunochemical methods Methods of measurement Storage, stability, and limitations of the assay 32P post-labelling Method of measurement Limitations and criticisms Validation of assays for DNA oxidation Oxo-dGuo in lymphocyte DNA Urinary measurements DNA–aldehyde adducts Biochemistry Method of measurement Products of reactive nitrogen species Endpoints arising from oxidative DNA damage Mutations Chromosome aberrations Micronuclei Site-specific DNA damage Relationship of DNA oxidation to disease Modulation of DNA oxidation biomarkers by antioxidants Direct and indirect effects of oxidative stress: measures of total oxidant/antioxidant levels Visualisation of cellular oxidants Biochemistry: histochemical detection of ROS Method of measurement Limitations, storage and stability Measurement of hydrogen peroxide Biochemistry Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Measurement of the ratio of antioxidant/oxidised antioxidant Biochemistry Method of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Total antioxidant capacity Biochemistry Terminology Methods of measurement Storage, stability and limitations on use Validation of assays for direct oxidant and antioxidant biomarkers Relationship of oxidant/antioxidant measurement to disease Modulation of oxidant/antioxidant biomarkers by dietary antioxidants Induction of genes in response to oxidative stress Background Measurement of antioxidant responsive genes and proteins Effects of antioxidant intake on the activity of antioxidant enzymes

Synthesis of sulforaphane and inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes as a basis for antigenotoxicity

Many dietary factors have been associated with a decreased risk of developing cancer. One potential mechanism by which these factors, chemopreventors, protect against cancer may be via alteration of carcinogen metabolism. The broccoli constituent sulforaphane (1-isothiocyanate-4-methylsulinylbutane) (CH3-S0-(CH2)4-NCS) has been isolated as a potential inducer of phase II detoxification enzymes and also protects rodents against 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benz[aJanthracene-induced mammary tumours. The ability of sulforaphane to also modulate phase I activation enzymes (cytochrome P450) (CYP450) was studied here. Sulforaphane was synthesised with an overall yield of 15%, essentially via 1-methylsulfinylphthalimidobutane, which was oxidised to the sulfoxide moiety. Deprotective removal of phthalimide yielded the amine, which was converted into sulforaphane by reaction with N,N'-thionocarbonyldiimidazole. Purity (95 %) was checked by 1H-NMR,13C-NMR and infrared and mass spectrometry.Sulforaphane was a competitive inhibitor of CYP2E1 in acetone-induced Sprague-Dawley rat microsomes (Ki 37.9 ± 4.5μM), as measured by the p-nitrophenol hydroxylase assay. Ethoxyresorufin deethylase activity (EROD), a measurement of CYP1A activity, was also inhibited by sulforaphane (100μM) but was not competitive, and a preincubation time-dependence was observed. In view of these results, the capacity of sulforaphane to inhibit N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)-induced genotoxicity (CYP2E1-mediated) was studied using mouse liver activation systems. Sulforaphane (>0.8μM) inhibited the mutagenicity of NDMA (4.4 mg/plate) in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100 after pre-incubation for 45 min with acetone-induced liver 9000 g supernatants from Balb/c mice. Unscheduled DNA synthesis induced by NDMA (33μ5 M) in mouse hepatocytes was also reduced by sulforaphane in a concentration-dependent manner (0.064-20μM). Sulforaphane was not genotoxic itself in any of these systems and cytotoxic only at high concentrations (>0.5 mM and > 40μM respectively). The ability of sulforaphane to modulate the orthologous human enzymes was studied using a human epithelial liver cell line (THLE) expressing individual human CYP450 isoenzymes. Using the Comet assay (a measurement of DNA strand breakage under alkaline conditions), NDMA (0.01-1μg/ml) and IQ (0.1-10μg/ml) were used to produce strand breaks in T5-2E1 cells (expressing human CYP2E1) and T5-1A2 cells (expressing human CYP1A2) respectively, however no response was observed in T5-neo cells (without CYP450 cDNA transfection). Sulforaphane inhibited both NDMA and IQ-induced DNA strand breakage in a concentration-dependent manner (0.1-10μM).The inhibition of metabolic activation as a basis for the antigenotoxic action of sulforaphane in these systems (bacteria, rodent hepatocytes and human cells) is further supported by the lack of this chemopreventor to influence NaN3 mutagenicity in S. typhimurium and H202-induced DNA strand breakage in T5-neo cells. These findings suggest that inhibition of CYP2E1 and CYP1A by sulforaphane may contribute to its chemoprotective potential.